In my initial survey of news articles relating to my voice, I came across two that really stood out. The Washington Post article “U.S. Catholic universities seeing influx of Muslim students” and the Chronicle of Higher Education’s article “A Christian College Devotes a Chapel to Many Faiths.” These two articles stood out to me because they tied directly to the experience that I am exploring for this project, and they offer concrete examples of what a number of religious institutions are doing to accept, manage, or dissuade religious diversity on their campuses.
In the Post article, the experiences of a number of Muslim students at Catholic University are discussed. The author notes that the number of Muslim students on that campus more than doubled in the five year period from 2006 to 2010 (when the article was published), with many of the Muslim students being international. The article quoted a student:
“Because it is an overtly religious place, it's not strange or weird to care about your religion here, to pray and make God a priority," said Shabnan, a political science major who often covers her head with a pale beige scarf. "They have the same values we do.”
But why are Muslim students choosing Catholic University, when the institution is closing itself off from embracing diversity? The article notes that the University has no co-ed dorms, has a policy against extramarital sex, and has common daily prayers. All things that would appeal to a student of any faith who chooses to live their life in a conservative manner. Yet, the University denied an application for the creation of a Muslim student group, and other student groups whose “beliefs run contrary to church teaching.” To contrast, Georgetown University hired a Muslim Chaplain more than 10 years ago, has a prayer room, and a Muslim student association.
I tend to be quite skeptical, and think of modern religious institutions with some suspicion that they may be – under the surface – thinly veiled attempts to convert diverse peoples, like some efforts I learned about in the History of Higher Ed course. The student quotes in this article really moved me, and they make me believe that exposure to new ideas and different faith traditions could be mutually beneficial for both the student and for the institution. Open dialogue on faith allows us to explore our own beliefs more thoroughly, and thus ties us more strongly to our faith tradition.
The article on Chapman University’s Fish Interfaith Center was a beautiful example of an openness to facilitating interfaith dialogue. I found the descriptions in the article so moving that I explored it further by visiting Chapman’s website and looking at photos of the center. Chapman is a Disciples of Christ institution, which is the church I was married in. My husband was raised a Disciple of Christ, a name which I always thought sounded like a cult. In my first meeting with a pastor, however, I found the church to be open to modern ideas, to people of diverse traditions, and overall quite liberal. The Chapman experience confirms that for me.
This article also relates some of the openness to diverse faith traditions to monetary reasons. Institutions found that they could not generate enough students if they remained restricted to their own faith tradition. If you allow students into your institution because you need their money, does that require you to maintain a certain level of welcoming acceptance to them? It seems that different institutions handle this in different ways. Chapman has gone all the way in attempting to make a place where diverse students can interact together, where students of all faith traditions can be comfortable, and yet a place that remains true to their faith tradition. I think this is amazing, and I would love to see it in person!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/12/19/AR2010121904199.html
http://chronicle.com.flagship.luc.edu/article/A-Christian-College-Devotes-a/7014/